@Shanmonster For genderless pronouns, I have seen more than one preference for the second part of that conjunction, so I try to respect that individual's choice.

@alan I totally get it for neopronouns. The layperson is less likely to be familiar with object/possessive for them.

@Shanmonster So I guess then that CIS folks list both as a form of alliance with those using neo-pronouns, to help normalize the practice.

@alan could be.

@Shanmonster I've always thought it was a convention to make it clear that those are someone's pronouns. that, and solidarity to neopronouns?

@xavier why stop at she/her? Why not she/her/hers?

@Shanmonster well in terms of signaling "I'm giving my/someone's pronouns", two is enough I think 🤔

@xavier how about her/hers?