@bonkers Of course I didn't.

@dalias so, another bold claim without any ground.

@bonkers No, it's not a "bold claim". There is no model of reality or how anything works in these systems, only pattern regurgitation in ways that correlate/align with context. If you get any comments that appear to explain motivations, they're copies of someone else's ideas from a similar context, not something reasoned to apply to your code.

The way you support or refute what I'm saying is through examination & analysis of the mechanisms, not examination of the output and whether it looks like what you would expect from human reasoning. "Looks like human reasoning" is the deception working as intended, and if you're trying to assess it from that standpoint, you're falling for the brain rotting program.

@dalias no, I'm just saying that it's a useful tool in an experienced engineer's hands. Everything else is your own assumption.

@bonkers i'm sure there's a tool involved