Replying to @ltning@anduin.net
@ltning This is what was included in my Warp 4: 1.0.1. I took that to be β1.0β. π€π€·ββοΈ
@movq@tilde.zone
Interests fluctuate. #Retrocomputing, #Retrogaming, #UT99, #FreeSoftware.
Does #AdventOfCode in December.
Posts auto-destruct after 90 days.
Replying to @ltning@anduin.net
@ltning This is what was included in my Warp 4: 1.0.1. I took that to be β1.0β. π€π€·ββοΈ
Okay, this is looking good.
I took my #AdventOfCode solutions from 2024, which I wrote for IBM Java 1 on OS/2 Warp 4, and gave them a try on Sun Java 1.3 on Windows 95. The build times feel a bit slower (I havenβt measured them, though) but the actual runtimes are a lot faster. π²
Thatβs at least a factor of 2-3, sometimes more. The difference on day16/1 is huge β I remember that this day was very memory intensive and IBM Javaβs garbage collection was struggling.
(And yes, that is LibreOffice Calc, because I, too, sometimes canβt be bothered.)
Java 1.3 on Windows 95 with Proton as the editor could be another option for next #AdventOfCode.
Win95 runs pretty smoothly on my old box (no surprise, that box came with Win95) and I like Java, so β¦ why not β¦
Not sure about the speed, though. π₯΄