Replying to @lykso@tiny.tilde.website

@mhoye Thought on it and wrote a bit in my day log. In short: Tailscale seems fine, but there's an anticapitalist, "dual power" bent to the network I'm contemplating; depending on Tailscale starts to feel a bit like an additional point of vulnerability to me. I'm also going to want to write membership management software that reflects whatever governing structure we wind up with, which means at some point I'd be likely to find myself having to work around abstractions that may not be a good fit.

Replying to @tbortels@infosec.exchange

@tbortels
yeah but headscale can only persist if tailscale (the company) allows it. the lead dev was hired by tailscale and they may decide that it's actually better to snuff it.
fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event

so it's still depending on a corporation. something happens, agenda changes (company is bought, management changes course or is replaced, etc) and we're out in the rain.

@mhoye @lykso

fosdem.orgFOSDEM 2026 - Headscale & Tailscale: The complementary open source clone
Jul 4, 2026, 23:10 UTCen

Replying to @zeh@mstdn.io

@mhoye @zeh @lykso

I mean, that's why it's an open license, but yes - if the tailscale folks decided so, it'd be dead in the water.

But - I don't think they will, at least not intentionally. I have a feeling headscale is a gateway drug - you try it out, decide you like it, but it's a pain because you need to run a server on a public IP and it doesn't have this new thing they added in tailscale and eventually it's just easier to buy into the tailscale ecosystem.

And - effective. I use tailscale's free stuff, and I'm comfortable enough with it I will very seriously consider it for non-hobby use at some point soon, I expect.