📝 #WSocial state of the network 📣

for those who are curious about it, considering the enthusiastic endorsement by prestigious European institutions.

#OpenData allows me to crunch numbers (information about Bluesky PDSs is readily available).

On day 18 since its beta launch in Brussels, W Social has 7935 accounts:

- 90,5% have never* published a single post
- 82,2% have 0 followers
- 78% follow 0 accounts

(may be related to #WIdentity and its 13-step process)

LMK if you find this useful

Jul 5, 2026, 12:24 UTCen

Replying to @_elena@mastodon.social

@_elena Thanks for the update Elena.

What i still find utterly baffling is the involvement of top EU politicians right from the start. When WSocial was announced at Davos, only a few presentation slides and probably a "Coming soon" website were available. But instead of waiting for the company to establish at least *some* kind of track record, these politicians jumped right on board. Why? Based on what exactly?

No matter how I try to make sense of this, I fail. Every time.

And the numbers you posted are devastating. No matter what we on the #fediverse think about this project, if it truly fails, the embarrassment will be epic. Not just for the politicians involved, but it also sends such a terrible signal to the rest of the world: "Europe can't do technology".

Argh.

Edit: Grammar

Replying to @_elena@mastodon.social

@_elena Are you allowed to sign up before you ID yourself, and not allowed to participate until you do?

If so, then I'd certainly be looking at the ID validation process to see why people can't make it through it--if this was my product and I wanted it to work for people.

Of course maybe I wouldn't care. Maybe I'm just doing it to get rich while I destroy the opportunity for this thing to actually get built so that it DOES work for people.