Replying to @prinlu@0x.trans.fail
@henriksundstrom @DoomsdaysCW tusky and phanpy and mastodon are showing it like this
ALT
ALT
ALT
prince lucija
@prinlu@0x.trans.fail
Computer sound noise music, new media, performance. Beats, noise, bass, kinky textures, & nyabinary space.
Also known as Luka Prinčič.
Gender-blender non-conforming kinkster. Posthuman transfeminist, plant-based, anti-capitalist, commoner, critical engineer. White, able-bodied, slavic/slovenian of jewish & romani descent.
Running Kamizdat boutique #CreativeCommons netlabel, employed at Emanat institute, Ljubljana
This profile is on single-user self-hosted instance of GoToSocial, part of the Fediverse. Otherwise Mastodon class of 2017. Online communication is messy and complicated. Let me know if you think I fucked up, I'm happy to learn. Network cultures since FIDONET, monochromatic text monitor, XT/286, and low-baud modem. Computer music since Scream Tracker 2 w/ COVOX.
Do NOT include this profile in any starter pack without permission.
Nazis, transphobes, misogynists, and other right-wing scum can fuck off.
#FairTradeMusic #FediWave #BeYourOwnPlatform #ElectronicMusic #ExperimentalMusic #MusicProduction #Music #nobot #nobots #TakaSnKakaSn
- pronouns
- he/she
- support
- https://prin.lu/support/
- Irregular Broadcast newsletter
- https://prin.lu/subscribe/
- The Backstairs Tone subscription
- https://prin.lu/backstairs/
- Digital Autonomy Research
- https://BeYourOwnPlatform.site
Replying to @henriksundstrom@mastodon.nu
@henriksundstrom @DoomsdaysCW audio recording works in tusky. it's actually just an audio attachment to post, different clients display it differently and all should play it properly.
The stated goal of many organizations in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) is to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI), an imagined system with more intelligence than anything we have ever seen. Without seriously questioning whether such a system can and should be built, researchers are working to create “safe AGI” that is “beneficial for all of humanity.” We argue that, unlike systems with specific applications which can be evaluated following standard engineering principles, undefined systems like “AGI” cannot be appropriately tested for safety. Why, then, is building AGI often framed as an unquestioned goal in the field of AI? In this paper, we argue that the normative framework that motivates much of this goal is rooted in the Anglo-American eugenics tradition of the twentieth century. As a result, many of the very same discriminatory attitudes that animated eugenicists in the past (e.g., racism, xenophobia, classism, ableism, and sexism) remain widespread within the movement to build AGI, resulting in systems that harm marginalized groups and centralize power, while using the language of “safety” and “benefiting humanity” to evade accountability.
— Timnit Gebru (@timnitGebru), Émile P. Torres, 2024
The TESCREAL bundle: Eugenics and the promise of utopia through artificial general intelligence | First Monday
https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/13636